Thursday, July 28, 2011

Corruption in South Korea: Rotten shot | The Economist

 

Corruption in South Korea

Rotten shot

A football scandal fouls South Korea’s modernising image

Jul 21st 2011 | SEOUL | from the print edition

 We wuz robbed

“THE entire nation is rotten,” said President Lee Myung-bak earlier this year. His frank outburst, in a country where the level of corruption has not fallen nearly as fast as economic and social indicators have climbed, was prompted by civil servants: the number of officials found to have broken the public-service ethics code almost doubled between 2008 and 2010.

The corporate sector is little better. Heads of chaebol (conglomerates) have been locked in a cycle of graft, conviction and the inevitable special pardon. Lee Kun-hee, chairman of Samsung Electronics (who was pardoned in 2009 for tax evasion), recently denounced corruption within part of his empire.

That makes it less surprising that football teams in the national K-League have similar problems. So far this month 46 players have been arrested during an investigation into match-fixing which, prosecutors say, affected the outcomes of at least eight games last year.

“Brokers”—mainly members of criminal gangs, or ex-players—would hand out bribes of perhaps 100m won ($95,000) to encourage scuffed shots or defensive howlers. Bets would then be placed via special lottery tickets that pay out if punters select a winning team as well as a winning ticket. Some suspect that organised-crime groups from China and South-East Asia, where match-fixing is said to be rife, were involved. Two clubs, Daejeon Citizen and Sangju Sangmu Phoenix, hold the dubious distinction of having more than ten players under arrest. Eight have now been given lifetime bans by the league.

According to a businessman involved in football, teams like Daejeon tended to have one ringleader, typically a middling player facing an uncertain retirement. After receiving the brown envelope from his broker, he would divide the money between team-mates in on the ruse. Thanks to South Korea’s culture of age-based hierarchy, it was especially hard for younger players to opt out. The clubby atmosphere discouraged whistle-blowing against higher-ups.

What is more, many football players are relatively hard-up. Some earn just 3m won a month. This makes the temptation to take “reward money” for fumbling a cross harder to resist.

The lack of money is partly a result of the best Korean talent moving to European clubs, which hurts attendances. The K-League says it may respond to the crisis by paying higher pensions. However, it is hard to escape the conclusion implied by President Lee’s comment. With a vibrant economy, South Korea has been promoted to the top division—but is undermined by the own goal of corruption.

Corruption in South Korea: Rotten shot | The Economist

Monday, July 25, 2011

BBC News - Viewpoint: Attacks strike at Norway's values

 

"We should not let fear paralyse our ability to think clearly and wisely," wrote Harald Stanghelle, political editor of the daily Aftenbladet. "There is much that we should not allow to be sacrificed on the altar of fear."

BBC News - Viewpoint: Attacks strike at Norway's values

Saturday, July 23, 2011

China's family planning: Illegal children will be confiscated | The Economist

 

But the policy has almost certainly reduced fertility below the level to which it would have fallen anyway. As a result, China has one of the world’s lowest “dependency ratios”, with roughly three economically active adults for each dependent child or old person. It has therefore enjoyed a larger “demographic dividend” (extra growth as a result of the high ratio of workers to dependents) than its neighbours. But the dividend is near to being cashed out. Between 2000 and 2010, the share of the population under 14—future providers for their parents—slumped from 23% to 17%. China now has too few young people, not too many. It has around eight people of working age for every person over 65. By 2050 it will have only 2.2. Japan, the oldest country in the world now, has 2.6. China is getting old before it has got rich.

The policy’s distortions have also contributed to other horrific features of family life, notably the practice of aborting female fetuses to ensure that the lone child is a son. The one-child policy is not the sole cause, as India shows, but it has contributed to it. In 20 years’ time, there will not be enough native brides for about a fifth of today’s baby boys—a store of future trouble. And even had the one-child policy done nothing to reduce births, the endless reiteration of slogans like “one more baby means one more tomb” would have helped to make the sole child a social norm, pushing fertility below the level at which a population reproduces itself. China may find itself stuck with very low fertility for a long time.

Demography is like a supertanker; it takes decades to turn around. It will pose some of China’s biggest problems. The old leadership is wedded to the one-child policy, but the new leadership, which is due to take over next year, can think afresh. It should end this abomination as soon as it takes power.

China's family planning: Illegal children will be confiscated | The Economist

China's population: Only and lonely | The Economist

 

Few expect significant reforms soon. The family-planning bureaucracy is a vast and entrenched interest group defending the status quo at all levels of government. Senior officials fear that any change would unleash a population boom, despite predictions to the contrary by most experts. With only a year to go until China’s first leadership change in a decade, no high-level figure in the central government is likely to back significant changes now. “If the government has political reasons for not being able to change the policy, then there is nothing I can do,” says Zheng Zizhen. “I can only say that from a scientific point of view, it is clear the policy needs to change.” Guangdong thinks so, too.

China's population: Only and lonely | The Economist

Thursday, July 21, 2011

New Bible Aims for ‘Common’ Language, Gender Neutrality - TIME NewsFeed

 

New Bible Aims for 'Common' Language, Gender Neutrality

By: Tim Newcomb
Topics: Bible, bible translation, Christian, common english bible, Jesus, Religion

We didn't know Jesus being called the “Son of Man” was so confusing. But the publishers of the Common English Bible translation want to clear up anything and everything that can confuse those inclined to dive into the Bible, so “Son of Man” now reads “the Human One.” Not exactly poetic, but arguably modern.

(LIST: 10 Surprising Facts About the World's Oldest Bible)

In an effort not only to make the Bible more accessible to modern readers, but also to appease both conservative and liberal denominations, the multi-denomination publishers of the new Bible translation—the Common English Bible Committee, an alliance of five publishers—out digitally now and in print in the next few weeks didn't just toss together a few new catchy phrases, though. They took the task seriously.

With more than 200 biblical scholars and church leaders representing more than 20 denominations, the committee translated straight from the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek texts, says associate publisher Paul Franklyn. When field-testing showed passages appeared confusing, project staff worked in modern phrasing. USA Today notes the committee was made up of "a coalition of Protestant denominational publishing houses owned by the United Methodist Church, one of the nation's largest denominations, and the Disciples of Christ, Presbyterian Church U.S.A., Episcopal Church and the United Church of Christ."

(MORE: Pastor Rob Bell: What if Hell Doesn't Exist?)

Along with switching out Jesus' well-known descriptor, the new $3.5 million Bible translation that took four years to complete, also tossed out “alien” and “foreigner” in places (read Exodus 22:21) in lieu of “immigrant”; shifts toward a more gender-neutral approach (“brother or sister” versus just “brother” when Jesus teaches to “warn,” not “rebuke” in Luke 17:3-4); adds in plenty of contractions; uses words such as “insulted” instead of “defiled” (1 Samuel 17:45); and eases up the language of the Lord's Prayer (found in Matthew 6:9-13) by switching out “hallowed be thy name” for “uphold the holiness of your name,” among other shifts.

To help catch a few eyes along the way, the CEB includes maps from National Geographic. There must be some proven science showing everyone loves a great map.

All the academic work has the Christian community talking (and reading), as the Fuller Theological Seminary in May made the new translation required reading for its students. New copies of the paperback edition will come out in August.

While the vocabulary may deviate slightly, the meaning coming from the Son of Man or the Human One remains the same. Ultimately, it's all still the Bible.

MORE: Biblical Bad Guy: Archaeologists Excavate Goliath's Hometown

Tim Newcomb is a contributor for TIME. Find him on Twitter at @tdnewcomb. You can also continue the discussion on TIME's Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.

New Bible Aims for ‘Common’ Language, Gender Neutrality - TIME NewsFeed

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The British press and the phone hacking scandal: Why David Cameron is not about to resign as prime minister | The Economist

 

Stephen Morris wrote:

Jul 19th 2011 1:26 GMT

Putting the theoretical rationalisations to one side, the realpolitik difference between the two cases is that the police are ultimately accountable to the politicians. If necessary, raw power can be exercised to make them resign.

In contrast, the politicians - taken as a whole - are accountable to no-one. Under Britain’s system of elective dictatorship, the people get only one choice – and then only once every five years – between two tweedledum and tweedledee cliques of elective dictators. Why on earth would David Cameron resign when he doesn’t face an election for four years??

As Rousseau observed 250 years ago:

The English people believes itself to be free; it is gravely mistaken; it is free only during the election of Members of Parliament; as soon as the Members are elected, the people is enslaved; it is nothing.

The British press and the phone hacking scandal: Why David Cameron is not about to resign as prime minister | The Economist

 

That is why it is no guarantee that you will have a responsive gvt when you have elections. But it is for sure that you will be a slave when without them. 

The British press and the phone-hacking scandal: Rupert and James Murdoch before Parliament | The Economist

 

Put another way, your employees can create profits as well as liabilities. If you want to claim the former, you are obliged to own the latter. That's what we call responsibility Mr. Murdoch. It's about time you took it.

The British press and the phone-hacking scandal: Rupert and James Murdoch before Parliament | The Economist

let her down easy


Let Her Down Easy

You're top man on the scene
You don't think life comes in between
But hey, she's just seventeen
She feels that she's a worldly girl
But man you've been around the world
She is just some worried daddy's girl
Even though there's nothing I can say
To cheat you and nature any way
Let her down easy
Her heart is on a dime
Let her down easy
And you'll grow up in time
In her strawberry eyes
The way she sees you signifies
That she's susceptible to your velvet lies
But if you must lay her down
May a butterscotch glow be her dressing gown
And please do not lead her on when you leave town
Even though there's nothing I can say
To cheat you and nature any way
Let her down easy
Her heart is on the line
Let her down easy
And you'll grow up in time
She's a woman now
With a daughter to make her proud
In her crayon world of paper clouds
She still remembers you
The first boy that she gave it to
And she laughs at how little then she knew
Her daughter's five and her grandfather adores her (of course)
Let her down easy
Her heart is on the line
Let her down easy
And you'll grow up in time

Monday, July 18, 2011

why we believe what we believe, a book

a wonderfully chaotic world

这的确是一个乱糟糟的世界;可那是多么好啊 [图片]

...
人是理性自利的吗? hmmm, 好像大部分时间是这样的. "天下熙熙,皆为利来;天下攘攘,皆为利往。"
以人类理性自利的推定(assumption)为基础,现代经济学建立起了庞大的体系,引入精深的数学模型作为分析的工具... 人类的经济行为似乎要被一网打尽了
但是 08年轰隆的一声 金融危机闪亮登场 ...
经济学家们羞怯地发现他们把很多重要的东西弄错了 经济学教科书必须重写...



即使人的行为受利益驱动,利益也有短期和长期利益之分;而且除了利益之外,还有很多东西驱动人的行为,比如价值观。估测特定个人会对其中的哪一种刺激做出反应是件非常不容易的事。



如果说人的个体行为规律仍然是个谜的话, 人类的集合体(社会)的行为逻辑则更是谜的平方。

总结一下:人似乎是那么回事 但实际上又不完全是那么回事;最糟糕的是 我们搞不清楚人到底在什么时候会是怎么回事。

结果就是我们生活在一个充满了变数的世界里 as ever

然而 这不是一个令人感到沮丧的理由 而是一个应当感到庆幸的理由。
这个世界的妙处正在于它的嘈杂喧哗和不可预知 in fact it is wonderfully chaotic.
世界因为它的变数而值得我们在那里生活 人类的命运因为它的变数而值得我们去关注

假如事实与此相反,假如这个世界在特定时间点的状态是可以精确预知的
假如存在一个伟大的头脑(它的能力是那个犹太大胡子的N倍),从微观到宏观他找到了人类行为和人类历史发展的规律,这个规律可以通过一个复杂的公式表达出来,借助计算机我们可以看到人类发展进程特定断面的精确图景...
换句话说 假如我们有办法将历史和未来拉到正午的大太阳底下暴晒,让一切都失去时间的遮蔽,毫发毕现地出呈现在我们面前...

假如是这样,这个世界更值得我们在其中生活吗?

大部分人会宁愿去死也不想生活在那个极度单调乏味的(或许还是可怕的)世界里。

如果你相信这个世界是神创造的,那么每天的第一件事情就应当感谢主没有把这个世界造得完美无缺和精确无误。

总结一下:这的确是一个乱糟糟的世界;可那是多么好啊.
This is a chaotic world, which is wonderful.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

BBC News - Phone hacking resignation: Statements in full

 

Former News International Chief Executive Rebekah Brooks and Chairman of News International James Murdoch have both issued statements in the wake of Ms Brooks' resignation over the phone-hacking scandal.

REBEKAH BROOKS' STATEMENT

Rebekah Brooks

"At News International we pride ourselves on setting the news agenda for the right reasons. Today we are leading the news for the wrong ones.

The reputation of the company we love so much, as well as the press freedoms we value so highly, are all at risk.

As Chief Executive of the company, I feel a deep sense of responsibility for the people we have hurt and I want to reiterate how sorry I am for what we now know to have taken place.

I have believed that the right and responsible action has been to lead us through the heat of the crisis. However my desire to remain on the bridge has made me a focal point of the debate.

This is now detracting attention from all our honest endeavours to fix the problems of the past.

Therefore I have given Rupert and James Murdoch my resignation. While it has been a subject of discussion, this time my resignation has been accepted.

Rupert's wisdom, kindness and incisive advice has guided me throughout my career and James is an inspirational leader who has shown me great loyalty and friendship.

I would like to thank them both for their support.

I have worked here for 22 years and I know it to be part of the finest media company in the world.

News International is full of talented, professional and honourable people. I am proud to have been part of the team and lucky to know so many brilliant journalists and media executives.

I leave with the happiest of memories and an abundance of friends.

As you can imagine recent times have been tough. I now need to concentrate on correcting the distortions and rebutting the allegations about my record as a journalist, an editor and executive.

My resignation makes it possible for me to have the freedom and the time to give my full cooperation to all the current and future inquiries, the police investigations and the CMS (Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee) appearance.

I am so grateful for all the messages of support. I have nothing but overwhelming respect for you and our millions of readers.

I wish every one of you all the best."

JAMES MURDOCH'S STATEMENT

James Murdoch James Murdoch

"I am writing to update you on the actions we have been taking as a company to solve the problems at News International relating to the News of the World, in addition to continuing to cooperate fully and actively with the police and settling civil claims.

Earlier today, Rebekah Brooks resigned from her position as CEO. I understand her decision and I want to thank her for her 22 years of service to the company.

She has been one of the outstanding editors of her generation and she can be proud of many accomplishments as an executive.

We support her as she takes this step to clear her name.

We have created an independent Management & Standards Committee and I want to emphasise its importance. The Committee has direct governance and oversight from News Corporation Board members and is codifying standards that will be clear and enforced.

We made the difficult and necessary decision to close the News of the World.

A number of other executives have now left the Company.

News Corporation also withdrew its proposal to acquire the shares in BSkyB it does not own. This is a strong signal that our top priority in the UK is to address the issues facing News International.

Looking to the future, I am also pleased to tell you that Tom Mockridge will become CEO of News International. Tom is in London today and will start right away.

Tom is a highly respected and accomplished media executive who has served as CEO of Sky Italia since its launch in 2003.

Tom, who has also been in charge of our European Television business, started his career as a newspaper journalist in New Zealand and he has held a range of top roles in the newspaper industry.

The creation of TG-24, Italy's only truly independent 24-hour news channel, is a credit to Tom's leadership and integrity.

This weekend, News International will run advertisements in all national newspapers. We will apologise to the nation for what has happened. We will follow this up in the future with communications about the actions we have taken to address the wrongdoing that occurred.

We are also sending letters to our commercial partners with an update on the actions we are taking.

Next week, my father and I will appear before the Commons Media Select Committee and will speak to them directly about our determination to put things right.

The Company has made mistakes. It is not only receiving appropriate scrutiny, but is also responding to unfair attacks by setting the record straight.

I would like to conclude by saying thank you. Throughout this time, you have gotten out great papers every day and have stayed focused.

I am deeply grateful for that."

BBC News - Phone hacking resignation: Statements in full

Friday, July 15, 2011

falsifiable–Popper

 

Popper's account of the logical asymmetry between verification and falsifiability lies at the heart of his philosophy of science. It also inspired him to take falsifiability as his criterion of demarcation between what is and is not genuinely scientific: a theory should be considered scientific if and only if it is falsifiable.

Karl Popper - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Open Society and Its Enemies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

The Open Society and Its Enemies is an influential two-volume work by Karl Popper written during World War II. Failing to find a publisher in the United States, it was first printed in London by Routledge in 1945. The work criticises theories of teleological historicism in which history unfolds inexorably according to universal laws, and indicts as totalitarian Plato, Hegel and Marx for relying on historicism to underpin their political philosophies[citation needed]. It was on the Modern Library Board's 100 Best Nonfiction books of the 20th century.[1]

The Open Society and Its Enemies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Modern Library 100 Best Nonfiction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Modern Library 100 Best Nonfiction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Modern Library 100 Best Nonfiction was created in 1998 by the Modern Library. The list is what it considers to be the 100 best non-fiction books published since 1900.

The Education of Henry Adams by Henry Brooks Adams topped the list, followed by The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James, Up From Slavery by Booker T. Washington and A Room of One's Own by Virginia Woolf. The list included everything from memoirs (such as those listed above) to text books (such as The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money by Keynes or The Elements of Style by Strunk and White) to polemics (like Silent Spring by Rachel Carson or Why We Can't Wait by Martin Luther King), to collections of essays (such as those of T. S. Eliot or James Baldwin).

A separate list of the 100 best novels of the 20th century was created the same year.

A list chosen by readers was published separately by Modern Library in 1999. With close to 200,000 votes,[1] The Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand was selected as the best non-fiction book. Two other titles related to Ayn Rand – Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand and Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life – were #3 and #6, respectively. The Reader's Poll has been used as an example of the unreliability of internet polls. [1]

Modern Library 100 Best Nonfiction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Dylan Thomas | Comments about "Fern Hill" | Page 3 | poetry archive | plagiarist.com

 

Fern Hill

2004-02-29

Added by: Jason

firstly for the people who believe this poem is crap-u are extremely ignorant and shouldn't even be reading Fern hill in the first place if you can't enjopy it.
This piece of literature is extraordinary. How hard is it to write a poem that is so deep and meaningful using images and illusions? very challenging. If the band i'm in could even dream anything close to this as lyrics for a song, we would be famous.
Thomas is describing the loss of innocence and the gradual ageing process that every human being goes through. This loss of innocence however starts when we gain knowledge of sex. as was in the garden of eden when adam and eve tasted the forbidden fruit and were banished from paradise. by eating that apple they became aware of sexuality. example of this-they suddenly put on clothes. in fern hill "up to the swallow thronged loft by the shadow of my hand." and guess what happens in the loft.
that's only 1 idea in this poem. the poem is about time and how we can have no control of it. we are young and innocent but nothing is everlasting. time will always impact on us and is controlling us in a sense of limits. The only way we can have some escape from this inevitability of death and time is the power of memory. We can restore or at least be aware of the innocence we once had.
So next time you remark on this poem in a negative way, at least try and think of what he is meaning, it doesn't really take that much thought.

Dylan Thomas | Comments about "Fern Hill" | Page 3 | poetry archive | plagiarist.com

pull the rug from under sb -- an idiom

pull the rug from under somebody/something also pull the rug from under somebody's feet
to suddenly take away help or support from someone, or to suddenly do something which causes many problems for them The school pulled the rug from under the basketball team by making them pay to practise in the school gymnasium.

the final arbiter

"...the final arbiter really is our conscience"  Aquino (A Filipino)

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Contagion in the euro zone: Selecting default | The Economist

 

A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link. The EU is only as strong as it's weakest members. Greece will not be allowed to fail.

Contagion in the euro zone: Selecting default | The Economist

Monday, July 11, 2011

Sex study only half the story - Yahoo! New Zealand News

 

An Otago sex study has hit back at claims made by gynaecologist Albert Makary that New Zealand women the most promiscuous in the world.

The Otago study has tracked over 1000 people since 1973 and has found half of all New Zealanders can still count their sexual partners on their fingers.

According to the study, half of the men had 10 or less sexual partners by age 32 and half the women had eight or fewer partners.

It was a small percentage of highly active men and women that pushed the stats up, making the average 20.8 for men and 13.3 for women.

These figures are within the realms of acceptability when it comes to the Durex survey quoted at a Family First conference by Christian Dr Makary, who said New Zealand women are too promiscuous and their sexual behavior was ruining family values.

Sex study only half the story - Yahoo! New Zealand News

Friday, July 8, 2011

NZ women promiscuous, says doctor - National - NZ Herald News

 

He cited a survey by a condom maker that said New Zealand women were the most promiscuous in the world, with 20.3 sexual partners on average. The world average was 7.3.

Kiwi men were also above average with 16.8 partners. New Zealand was the only country where women had more sexual partners than men.

NZ women promiscuous, says doctor - National - NZ Herald News

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

the morning purge














http://www.flickr.com/photos/hajoda/2421160258/sizes/m/in/photostream/




chequered blue

Saturday, July 2, 2011

The Cypress and the Oak Tree

 

An excerpt from the book, The Prophet by Kahlil Gibran i

 

“You were born together, and together you shall be forevermore.
You shall be together when the white wings of death scatter your days.
Ay, you shall be together even in the silent memory of God.
But let there be spaces in your togetherness,
And let the winds of the heavens dance between you.

Love one another, but make not a bond of love:
Let it rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
Fill each other’s cup but drink not from one cup.
Give one another of your bread but eat not from the same loaf.
Sing and dance together and be joyous, but let each one of you be alone,
Even as the strings of a lute are alone though they quiver with the same music.

Give your hearts, but not into each other’s keeping.
For only the hand of Life can contain your hearts.
And stand together yet not too near together:
For the pillars of the temple stand apart,
And the oak tree and the cypress grow not in each other’s shadow.”

The Cypress and the Oak Tree – duttyism

Friday, July 1, 2011

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 5: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

 

The hard landing that I foresee for China will probably prick the global commodity bubble, which is already showing signs of topping out.

Agricultural product prices have jumped, the result of robust demand, bad weather last year in Russia, recent floods in Australia, and dry and hot La Nina conditions in Argentina.

Industrial metals such as copper were on a tear. So were precious metals, such as silver.

But much of the leap in commodity prices was due to investors and other speculators. Exchange-traded funds had already tied up much of the physical supplies of gold and other precious metals. Futures contracts held by speculators were up 12 percent in 2010 through October, with sharp increases in bullish bets on crude oil, copper and silver. Volatility forced futures exchanges to raise margin requirements on a number of commodities.

The confidence that China would continue to buy huge quantities of almost all commodities has been the bedrock belief of speculators. For example, there were rumors that China was again building its emergency petroleum reserve in the first half of this year.

I’ve studied many bubbles over the years, and concentrated on predicting their demises. Commodities show every sign of being in one.

Rare-Earth Exports

China added to the commodity frenzy last year by slashing exports of rare-earth metals used in high-tech batteries, TV sets, mobile phones and defense products. China supplies 95 percent of these elements, and consumes 60 percent, exporting the rest. Its exports of rare earths fell 9 percent in 2010, but still exceeded the government’s quota by a third.

Chinese authorities cut the export quota for the first half of this year by 35 percent from a year earlier. Japanese manufacturers of high-tech gear are seeking alternative supplies. Of course, China maintains that its ongoing trade and political spats with Japan have nothing to do with the tighter quotas. They were necessary, Chinese leaders say, to sustain rare-earth development and deal with environmental damage caused by mining.

Speculators are starting to take stock of the evidence of a hard landing in China, and industrial commodity prices, including copper, are swooning. As in the past, warnings about shortages in key industrial inputs are magically being contradicted as unaccounted-for stockpiles materialize.

Weather-Driven Supply

Agricultural producers are influenced by global demand and by weather-driven supply. I’ll leave it to others to forecast the weather. But note that ideal growing weather often follows the kind of bad weather we’ve seen lately, and bumper crops and surpluses often replace worrying shortages in a crop-year or two.

Furthermore, China imports (and might have stockpiled) soybeans and other agricultural products that would suffer from a slowing economy. Weakness in industrial commodities can easily spread to the agricultural area. Notice the close correlation among all commodity groups in recent years. The huge quantities of hot, highly leveraged money now sloshing around the world tend to end up on the same side of the same trade at the same time.

As speculators suffer setbacks in one area, they quickly bail out of other, fundamentally unrelated areas to preserve their capital.

Commodity Exporters

The bursting of the commodities bubble will be bad news for developing-country producers such as Brazil, which has thus far largely escaped recent global economic and financial woes but is a major exporter of iron ore and other commodities to China. Developed commodity exporters -- Canada, New Zealand and Australia -- as well as their currencies, may also suffer.

I’ve long believed that a hard landing in China would be preceded by a price collapse in copper and other industrial commodities. Copper prices peaked in February, and Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX)’s agreement on April 25 to acquire copper producer Equinox Minerals Ltd. to gain mineral resources outside its area of specialization is a classic sign of a peak.

Another classic sign of a speculative price peak was the sudden appearance of copper inventories where none were thought to exist. As prices start to break, hoarded commodities suddenly become available for sale by highly leveraged owners. Copper in China was so abundant that bonded warehouses were full. In January and February, extra copper was sold abroad as Chinese exports were eight times the year-earlier total.

Falling Copper Prices

London Metal Exchange bonded warehouses saw copper inventories leap 17 percent in the first quarter. Furthermore, to circumvent tight bank lending in China, borrowers are relying more on available letters of credit to finance copper arbitrage trading and otherwise have the use of the borrowed money with copper purchases as their collateral. If copper prices continue to fall, those borrowers will have to sell their copper on the market to prevent further losses, resulting in still-lower prices.

Meanwhile, sugar topped out in February, and cotton in March. I pointed this out in a speech to an investor conference in April, and several people in the audience questioned my facts. I compared those who hadn’t noticed this peak to Wile E. Coyote of the “Road Runner” cartoons, who runs off the cliff and finds himself suspended in air before dropping to the valley floor.

Further confirmation came May 2, when silver prices, which had skyrocketed earlier, started to collapse and virtually all other commodities followed: crude oil, cotton, copper, grains and even gold.

Moving in Lockstep

As I noted earlier, there is so much leverage money floating around the world that regardless of how it’s managed --by fundamental, momentum or technical strategies -- it tends to end up on the same side of the same trades at the same time. So, when one of these positions reverses, the effects spread rapidly as speculators bail out of their positions to reduce risk and preserve their capital. Keep in mind that the prices of the wide variety of commodities continue to move in lockstep.

Many commodity bulls see this trend as a short-lived midcourse price correction and have maintained their long positions in copper, crude oil, corn and even silver. But markets anticipate, and it now appears the declines in commodities are foreshadowing a hard landing in China, with the effects spreading globally.

(A. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary Shilling & Co. and author of “The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow Growth and Deflation.” The opinions expressed are his own. This is the last of a five-part series.)

Read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.

Read more Bloomberg View op-eds.

To contact the author of this column: A. Gary Shilling at insight@agaryshilling.com.

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 5: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

Shilling: China Heading for a Hard Landing, Pt. 4 - Bloomberg

 

Past performance, in China’s case, may be indicative of future results.

In late 2007, the Chinese government was scrambling to control a capital-spending boom. The central bank was concerned about 11 percent growth in gross domestic product, far above its official target of 8 percent, and about money flooding in from exports and direct foreign investment.

By Nov. 1, the People’s Bank of China had raised its one-year lending rate five times and reserve requirements eight times to soak up excess liquidity.

My firm’s research predicted then that the government would curb capital spending and excess liquidity just as exports weakened. Then, as excess capacity mounted, direct foreign investment would disappear and deflation would reign.

That’s essentially what happened in 2008 and 2009, as the effects of China’s fiscal and monetary restraint coincided with the worldwide economic slump. The growth rate dropped to 6 percent, which in China constituted a major recession.

Don’t be surprised if history repeats itself in the next few years.

This time around, some signs of cooling are already apparent. Besides dampened housing demand, the HSBC Flash China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index in June fell to 50.1, its lowest level in 11 months. Passenger-vehicle sales grew 33 percent in 2010, when the government subsidized small-car purchases, but only 3 percent this April over a year earlier.

Money, Banks, Stocks

Growth in the broadest measure of China’s money supply has declined from 30 percent year-over-year in December 2009 to 15 percent year-over-year at the end of May. Bank loans fell 25 percent in May from April. Excavator sales fell 10 percent in May from a year earlier, possibly foreshadowing a construction bust. The 14.3 percent decline in the Shanghai Composite Index last year and the 10 percent drop since mid-April also don’t bode well for growth.

Despite all these negatives, with recent data showing first-quarter GDP expanding by a still-healthy 9.7 percent, and consumer inflation at its highest levels since July 2008, China has continued to tighten its economic policy. The government raised banks’ reserve requirements to 21.5 percent in June, the ninth such increase since November. And it will probably continue to tighten until it sees decisive results -- that is, ahard landing.

What will happen next?

No Floating Yuan

For one thing, even though a hard landing could cause hot money to flee the country and weaken the yuan, China will not float its currency. Many Western governments argue that if China allowed the tightly controlled yuan to float freely, it would rise against the dollar and other major currencies. That, the thinking goes, would discourage exports, encourage imports and quickly eliminate China’s chronic trade surplus.

The Chinese have repeatedly told Western officials that they will not be pushed into floating the yuan. They worry that a jump in the currency’s value would wreak havoc on Chinese exporters and force them to move production to cheaper venues. A stronger yuan would also reduce the value of China’s foreign- currency reserves.

Furthermore, exchange rates have only limited effects on import or export prices and, therefore, imports and exports themselves. The key determinant of a country’s exports is the economic health of its trading partners. If their economies are robust, they buy more of everything, including imports.

The dammed-up zeal to own the Chinese currency would dissipate quickly if all barriers were removed and it became clear that a more expensive yuan was not ending China’s trade surplus. Pressure from foreign governments for a stronger yuan would then evaporate, as would interest in owning more Chinese currency in anticipation of higher values. And the removal of restrictions that prevent Chinese from diversifying their investments abroad might actually depress the yuan by encouraging money to flow out of China.

Holding Treasuries

China also won’t be selling its $1 trillion in reserves ofU.S. Treasuries in great amounts, as some have feared. The Chinese are well aware that doing so would be disastrous for their economy, because the resulting nosedive in Treasury prices and the dollar would decimate the value of China’s remaining holdings of U.S. debt and other assets. A global depression might well ensue, with China and other export-dependent countries as the biggest losers.

Excess Capacity

Instead, China’s most likely reaction -- to focus still more on exports -- will exacerbate its hard landing. Ifconsumer spending doesn’t increase substantially in the next few years, China will have a serious problem using all the industrial capacity it has built, partly to keep people employed. Capacity is mushrooming so rapidly that even in China’s booming economy, most manufacturers are still seeing flat or falling utilization rates.

This unused capacity portends weak profits and trouble for the loans that financed it. My judgment is that it will once again be used for exports aimed at the U.S. and Europe. And once again, this will add to global excess supply and put downward pressure on prices.

Then China, along with other export-dependent emerging economies, will be competing fiercely in a world of slow growth and deflation.

(A. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary Shilling & Co. and author of “The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow Growth and Deflation.” The opinions expressed are his own. This is the fourth in a five-part series.)

Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.

Read more Bloomberg View op-eds.

Shilling: China Heading for a Hard Landing, Pt. 4 - Bloomberg

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 3: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

 

China is hoping to cool its white-hot economy without precipitating a recession. Doing so will be extremely difficult: Inflation fears are growing, the government’s ability to respond is quite limited, and China’s economic model, which leaves bureaucrats guessing about the market effects of their directives, is ultimately untenable.

Inflation worries start with housing. With Chinese exports curtailed by U.S. consumer retrenchment, capital spendingthreatened by government restraints and excess capacity, and domestic spending less than robust, housing has been China’s big generator of economic growth in recent years. By some estimates, half of Chinese GDP is linked to real-estate activity.

The government is fearful of rising prices, and has moved to prevent speculation. Buyers must now put down 60 percent of the purchase price on second homes, and 30 percent on first homes. The government is pressing banks to contain mortgages, and some have raised interest rates. In January, the mayor ofShanghai announced a new tax on property transactions that may be copied nationwide as other officials attempt to cool prices.

With these restraints in place, and with supply starting to catch up with demand, housing sales have slowed. But this has not fully curtailed China’s real-estate bubble: Housing starts rose about 40 percent last year. Developers are rushing to build while they try to support faltering prices by delaying completions and creating artificial shortages. Of course, these efforts are difficult to maintain because they tie up capital in uncompleted houses. Houses are now being built at about twice the rate they’re being sold, well above earlier norms.

Huge Loans

A report this week by China’s National Audit Office found that a significant chunk of bank loans made to provincial-government financing vehicles were improperly funneled into property investments, contributing to a debt load equal to some 27 percent of GDP. Other huge loans to state-owned enterprises, intended to finance infrastructure, also reportedly went into real estate and may be at risk.

With inventories soaring while demand softens, and the government clamping down on speculation, a collapse of the housing bubble seems increasingly likely.

Prices Rising

Housing isn’t the only area where signs of inflation are popping up. In May, consumer prices increased 5.5 percent versus a year earlier. In December, Chinese leaders agreed to “put stabilizing the overall price level in a more prominent position” in their ranking of economic priorities. In a country where many live at or below the poverty level, food costs are obviously a major concern, and they jumped 11.7 percent in May from a year earlier.

The government appears increasingly worried about social unrest. In November, it said it was ready to impose price controls to reduce inflation, especially on food and energy, and said it would help the poor with higher welfare payments. The unrest continues and, significantly, has moved from rural areas to the cities.

Income inequality also remains a problem. The flow of Chinese to more prosperous urban areas has increased averageliving standards, but the difference between the rich and the rest continues to widen. In 2010, annual per-capita income was about $2,900 in cities and about $900 in rural areas. (Adjusting for lower costs in rural areas reduces this gap.)

Limited Response

China’s ability to respond to these worries is extremely limited. The central bank relies on adjusting reserve requirements and limits on bank lending to implement monetary policy. Since January 2010, it has raised reserve requirements 12 times (to 21.5 percent), while only increasing the one-year lending rate four times (to 6.31 percent), to accommodate inefficient state-enterprise borrowers, which provide a lot of jobs.

Finally, implementing any policy in an economy that is partly government-controlled, partly market-driven is very difficult. In a completely controlled economy, as China’s used to be, government leaders might have made economically inefficient decisions, but their authority wasn’t disputed. In an open economy, as in Singapore, the markets make the decisions, and politicians have little involvement.

But under China’s current arrangement, officials making major decisions have to guess what market reactions will result, then try to mitigate the unintended consequences of their actions.

Unintended Consequences

With a managed floating exchange rate, for example, officials have to estimate how much hot money will enter China in anticipation of a stronger currency, and then determine how to neutralize the undesired effects of this flow. Government policies that encourage exports and trade surpluses have pushed China’s foreign-currency reserves to more than $3 trillion. Until recently, all the foreign-currency earnings of Chinese exporters had to be traded in for yuan, but then the central bank was forced to issue securities to sop up that money to avoid depreciation.

Similarly, the Chinese government sets yearly limits on bank loans in advance, but leaves it up to the banks and demand to determine the monthly lending pattern. So the banks rush to make loans early in the year for fear that the government will reduce the limit in a midcourse correction.

I suspect that such a hybrid market system is too unwieldy to allow the Chinese government to manage a soft landing for its economy. By my reckoning, the Federal Reserve has tried 12 times in the post-World War II era to cool an overheating economy without precipitating a recession. It succeeded only once. Can the politically controlled Chinese central bank, and the government leaders who really call the shots, be more successful than the independent Fed?

That seems unlikely. And the consequences, for China and the world economy, could be unfortunate.

(A. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary Shilling & Co. and author of “The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow Growth and Deflation.” The opinions expressed are his own. This is the third in a five-part series.)

Read Part 1 and Part 2.

Read more Bloomberg View op-eds.

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 3: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 2: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

 

China has become an economic giant because it has so many people who are producing moderate amounts. In most ways, however, China remains an underdeveloped country with political and economic policy tools that are crude by Western standards. Those tools can spur impressive growth --but they also mask some deep structural weaknesses in China’s economy.

It’s relatively easy for developing countries to grow by emulating the technology of advanced nations or, in China’s case, by forcing them to share it as the price of doing business or by simply stealing it.

And a tightly controlled economy can get results quickly. That’s what happened with China’s $586 billion stimulus program introduced in 2009. Growth in gross domestic product leaped from a 6 percent rate in early 2009 back to double digits. Most of the money was channeled through government-controlled banks, whose lending increased by $1.4 trillion, or 32 percent, over the course of 2009 after being flat since early 2006. The money supply increased by 29 percent.

Those loans financed public and industrial infrastructure and real estate. Property prices in January 2010 were up 9.5 percent from a year earlier, according to government numbers, and much more by private realistic estimates. Employment gained along with economic activity, and in the third quarter of 2009, there were 94 job openings for every 100 applicants, up from 85 in depressed 2008, and close to the pre-crisis average of 97.

Unsustainable Growth

Here’s what we should remember: This kind of growth is unsustainable, and it won’t be able to cover up China’s underlying vulnerabilities forever.

China’s reliance on exports and a controlled currency for growth, for instance, will no longer work if U.S. consumers are engaged in a chronic saving spree, as I believe they will be. Chinese export growth, which averaged 21 percent per year in the last decade, is bound to suffer.

The country’s seemingly inexhaustible pool of cheap labor is expected to peak in 2014, in part due to its rigid one-child policy. By some estimates, ample labor has boosted GDP growth by 1.8 percentage points annually since the late 1970s, but the contraction of the working-age population will reduce growth by 0.7 percentage points by 2030.

Wages and Ages

Wages are already rising, and even Chinese manufacturers are moving production to Vietnam and Pakistan, where pay levels are a third of China’s. Some factory workers have seen wage increases of 20 percent to 30 percent in the last year or so, with those producing goods for foreign companies seeing especially large boosts. At the same time, better conditions in rural areas have reduced the flow of cheap labor into coastal cities.

As the Chinese population ages, the ratio of retirees to working-age people is forecast to rise from 39 percent last year to 46 percent in 2025.

This does not bode well for China’s future growth. When Communist Party leaders transitioned China’s economy from a cradle-to-grave nanny state to a progressively free-market one starting in 1978, no meaningful unemployment, retirement or state health systems were instituted. (Although President Hu Jintao said in October that China will “institute a social safety net that covers all,” and the government has set a goal of providing basic medical care for all Chinese by 2020.)

Prodigious Saving

So the Chinese must save prodigiously to provide for their welfare and retirement. This has contributed mightily to China’s high rate of saving and low rate of spending, and its consequent reliance on exports. Chinese households save close to 30 percent of income on average, in large part to cover old age and medical costs.

Yes, the Chinese saving rate will be pushed down in time by aging Chinese who still consume but no longer work, much as it has in Japan. Nevertheless, less saving and more Chinese consumption won’t substitute for weakening exports any time soon. Chinese consumers buy only about one-tenth of those in Europeand the U.S. combined. As the euro zone remains troubled, and the U.K. slashes government stimulus and U.S. consumers continue to retrench, it’s unlikely that a drop in Chinese saving could offset the negative effects of reduced exports.

Inflation Looming

Finally, China’s state-controlled economic boom may soon lead to crippling inflation. In February 2010, the director of the National Bureau of Statistics said that “asset-price increases pose a challenge for macroeconomic policy.”

The housing boom has pushed up prices to the point that apartments in Beijing are affordable to only the top 20 percent of earners -- they’re selling at about 22 times average income (average U.S. house prices peaked at six times average income). A square meter of property in China costs an estimated 164 times per-capita income, compared with 33 times in high-priced Japan.

The 2009 stimulus package also spurred consumer price inflation to a year-over-year acceleration of 5.5 percent in May. Food prices are very sensitive politically because so many Chinese are at subsistence incomes, and they rose 11.7 percent in May from a year earlier.

Chinese leaders are not amused, and are taking stringent restraining actions. But with only blunt-force economic tools available, it’s not clear that they’ll be capable of managing a controlled slowdown without significant pain.

(A. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary Shilling & Co. and author of “The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow Growth and Deflation.” The opinions expressed are his own. This is the second in a five-part series.)

Read Part 1. Read more Bloomberg View op-eds.

To contact the author of this column: A. Gary Shilling at insight@agaryshilling.com.

To contact the editor responsible for this column: Timothy Lavin at tlavin1@bloomberg.net.

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 2: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

 

Jesse McKay 3 days ago 6 comments collapsed CollapseExpand

I tend to agree with the author on China's future from an economic standpoint.
China presents today as a primarily agrarian country of 1300 million people.  Claims that it manufactures most of America's goods, or is the principal manufacturing country of the world, are false: that title rests with the United States and her heavily mechanized factories.
Fearmongers in the USA point to China and in shrill tones proclaim she is sweatshopping us to death; but, in reality, this is nonsense.  Such a plot needs two acts -- in Act I, the country sells so many goods so cheaply as to wreck the production and capacity of its buyers (check the books: this is not happening.  The USA produces more goods today than it did in the heyday of 1970 but with far fewer workers).  In Act II, the country breaks off exports and turns against its former customer.
My friends, there is no such Act II on the horizon.  China's industrial rise of the past 40 years has lifted it from Afghanistan-poverty into Mexico-poverty, and there it shall stay.  Assembly workers building plastic toys or steel tools do not generate USA-style wealth and they never will. 
Americans make toys, but they are more than manufacturers.  Americans are designers.  In this category, China lags far, far behind and their pitiful gains are not enough.  "Hello Kitty" is not going to eclipse Disney or even Ronald McDonald.
Ladies and gentlemen, China saw a world where she was too big to fail and has simply become too big to succeed.
China's military buildup is cause for concern, yes, but they are pushing a bamboo ceiling they won't be able to crack.  Could China invade its neighbors -- India, Russia, Japan, steal their wealth, and become the new superpower?  No.  Any such plan is foolish, self-defeating, and insufficient.  China can field millions of soldiers but it cannot feed them.  To war with her customers is to lose them, and she certainly cannot afford to do that.  America doesn't relish a war with China but it will not shrink from one and it is prepared for one.
We should worry about China joining with Muslim terror groups.  We should worry about China trading nuclear technology with less visible actors who believe in national suicide (China doesn't).  We should worry about Chinese spies.
We shouldn't worry about 21st century capitalism breaking down before 19th century communism, because that is not going to happen.  Everything they steal, we'll make 10 times better in the next generation.
To sum-up, China makes 10 percent of our stuff.  We buy it because it's cheap.  That, my friends, is an arrangement made in hell.  They'll never get rich from it, and their power over us is centered on the idea that Americans need more and more cheap stuff... but the dynamic is, people who have cheap stuff want good stuff, and those goods are not Chinese.  So.. bamboo ceiling.

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

Plaza Accord and Japan’s “lost decade”

 

jamesin reply to Teik Min Lim 2 days ago 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand

The Plaza accord was signed in 1985 and was a multilateral agreement between France, German, Japan, the US, and the UK.
Japan didn't ruin their economy by allowing currency appreciation. It had a minimal (almost no) effect on the Japanese trade surplus. The "lost decade" was the result of rapidly aging demographics and relying too heavily on fixed asset investment for growth. Japan is a trade surplus country and has been for a long time but they now have, by far, the largest proportion of debt in the world and weaker purchasing power than their nominal GDP would otherwise indicate. Currency manipulation bring short-mid term benefits while fueling unsustainable debt in other parts of the world; however it will catch up with the currency manipulator later on big time via big hits to ROI and lagging "real" competitiveness. Foreign currency reserves parked in treasuries making less in interest than the rate of inflation are a very poor investment policy.
Japan was hit with heavy social security costs that were captured by the government. China with its weaker social security net will put more burden on working class children to support the elderly subtracting from productivity. So it's not like the costs can be avoided by simply ignoring the problem.
The myth that avoiding calls for ending currency manipulation and keeping trade protectionism in place will ensure China avoids a Japan-like crisis seems to be alive and well. Unfortunately it's dead wrong, China is facing Japan's greatest problem (a rapidly aging population) and making the same big mistakes (amassing unsustainably large poorly invested foreign currency reserves while relying too heavily on fixed asset investment to drive growth). What China doesn't have that Japan had are friendly growing markets in the US and EU; both regions will see weak growth and are likely to become more protectionist when fiscal stimulus proves ineffective. The "Asian export model" will almost certainly fall apart this decade.

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

 

Few countries are more important to the global economy than China. But its reputation as an unstoppable giant -- as a country with an unending supply of cheap labor and limitless capacity for growth -- masks some serious and worsening economic problems.

China’s labor force is aging. Its consumers save too much and spend too little. Its political and economic policy tools remain crude. Its state bureaucracy seems likely to curb spending just as exports weaken, and thus risks deflation. As U.S. consumers retrench, and as the global commodity bubble begins to dissipate, these fundamental weaknesses will combine in a way that’s unlikely to end well for China -- or for the rest of the world.

To start, China is much more vulnerable to an international slowdown than is generally understood. In late 2007, my firm’s research found that too few people in China had the discretionary spending capability to support its economy domestically. Our analysis showed that it took a per-capita gross domestic product of about $5,000 to have meaningful discretionary spending power in China.

About 110 million Chinese had that much or more, but they constituted only 8 percent of the population and accounted for just 35 percent of GDP in 2009, while exports accounted for 27 percent. Even China’s middle and upper classes had only 6 percent of Americans’ purchasing power.

Why Overconfidence Abounds

With such limited domestic spending, why do so many analysts predict that China can continue its robust growth?

In part because they believe in the misguided concept of global decoupling -- the idea that even if the U.S. economy suffers a setback, the rest of the world, especially developing countries such as China and India, will continue to flourish. Recently -- after China’s huge $586 billion stimulus program in 2009; massive imports of industrial materials such as iron oreand copper; booms in construction of cement, steel and power plants, and other industrial capacity; and a pickup in economic growth -- the decoupling argument has been back in vogue.

This concept is flawed for a simple reason: Almost all developing countries depend on exports for growth, a point underscored by their persistent trade surpluses and the huge size of Asian exports relative to GDP. Further, the majority of exports by Asian countries go directly or indirectly to the U.S. We saw the effects of this starting in 2008: As U.S. consumers retrenched and global recession reigned, China and most other developing Asian countries suffered keenly.

Overconfidence in China’s ability to keep its economy booming is also partly psychological. It reminds me of the admiration and envy (even fear) that many felt toward Japanduring its bubble days in the 1980s. As Japanese companies bought California’s Pebble Beach, Iowa farmland and Rockefeller Center in New York, what was safe from their zillions? Then the Japanese stock and real-estate bubbles collapsed, and Japan entered the deflationary depression in which it’s still mired.

Success and Complacency

What’s more, China’s recent successes have been so pronounced that they’ve led many to conclude that its economy is a juggernaut. And, indeed, the Chinese have much to be proud of: Last year, China passed Japan to become the world’s second largest economy, a huge achievement considering China started in the late 1970s with a tiny pre-industrialized economy.

But this success may have led to complacency. I suspect that the 2007-2009 global recession, and the dramatic transformation by U.S. consumers from gay-abandon borrowers-and-spenders to Scrooge-like savers, caught Chinese leaders flat-footed. They probably planned to encourage consumer spending and domestic-led growth, but later -- much later.

Growth Machine

They were enjoying a well-oiled growth machine. Growing exports, especially to American consumers, stimulated thecapital spending needed to produce yet more exports and jobs for the millions of Chinese streaming from farms to cities. Wages remained low, due to ample labor supplies, and held down consumer spending. So did the high Chinese consumer saving rate. Because Chinese could not invest offshore, much of that saving went into state banks at low interest rates. The money was then lent to the many inefficient government-owned enterprises at subsidized rates.

In a country where stability is almost worshipped, why would any leader want to disrupt such a smoothly running economy?

But before you worry about China’s becoming No. 1 any time soon, consider the remaining gap between its economy and theU.S. economy. In 2009, China’s GDP was $4.9 trillion, only 34 percent of the U.S.’s $14.3 trillion. Because China has 1.32 billion people, or 4.3 times as many as the U.S. has, the gap in per-capita GDP was even bigger: China’s $3,709 was only 8 percent of the U.S.’s $46,405.

A Wide Gap

Just to maintain this gap at current levels, Chinese GDP will need to grow at double-digit rates for four years before tapering off, or rise sixfold in three decades (assuming that U.S. real GDP increases 2 percent per year on average for the next 30 years, and using government population projections). To close the per-capita GDP gap in 30 years, Chinese GDP would need to grow about 10 percent per year for three decades, or expand to 17.8 times its current size in that period.

Such rates of growth seem close to impossible if the global economy slows.

As the announcer for the Cleveland Indians used to say when the Tribe was hopelessly behind, “They have their work cut out for them!”

(A. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary Shilling & Co. and author of “The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow Growth and Deflation.” The opinions expressed are his own. This is the first in a five-part series.)

Read more Bloomberg View op-eds.

To contact the author of this column: A. Gary Shilling at insight@agaryshilling.com.

To contact the editor responsible for this column: Timothy Lavin at tlavin1@bloomberg.net.

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg